Market Watch - October 27, 2006
Absolutely
not. Easy does it. Focus upon short term money market instruments
and continue to accumulate at least “A” rated stocks
that sell at a PE ratio of less than their historical average and
pay a dividend equal to 4% of the purchase price, or better. Buy
stocks that lead their industry. Stick rigidly with this plan and
one can stay ahead of inflation, enjoy long term growth in their
portfolio, lower risk, and sleep at night.
Question: The Dow just passed the record established six years ago of 11,722
points and zipped through 12,000. Shouldn’t the cagey investor
be fully invested in stocks?
Answer: The average DJIA PE ratio is 18 times earnings today, considerably
better pricing than the PE average in 2000 of 29 times earnings.
The Dow would top 19,000, a 60% increase from current levels, if
the PE ratio were 29 times earnings today. That could happen with
all the liquidity that exists today, but the risk is great that
the market might go down, rather than up. At these current levels
of 12,000, the market is still severely over-priced.
Question: Why does Market Watch say the market is currently over-priced?
Answer: The historical DJ average yield is above 4%, and the historical
PE average is 14 times earnings. At today’s prices, the average
PE, as mentioned above, is 18 times earnings, or 30% above the historical
average. If the market returned to average PE levels, the market
would be priced at 9,500 points.
Question: Market Watch mentioned “liquidity”. Exactly what does
liquidity mean?
Answer: Liquidity is cash available in the economy to invest and/or spend.
There is a lot of cash available to borrow at the banks because
the Federal Reserve System continues to create billions of dollars
a week out of nothing. It’s a “dream come true”
for governments: unaccountable creation of money out of nowhere.
This “money creation” has theoretically helped to smooth
out the rough spots in our economy. Government interference in the
economy to smooth out recessions is at the heart of Keynesian economic
thinking. The government has severely ratcheted up the creation
of money over the last six years to stave off a potentially devastating
recession. And while that has worked, for every action there is
an opposite “correcting” economic reaction that will
be painful when faced in the future.
Question: What correcting reactions are likely to be painful?
Answer: The administration told the public last week that the 2007 fiscal
year will show a deficit of less than $200 billion, but that’s
because the government plans to borrow $350 billion from funds like
Social Security for a real deficit of at least $550 billion. The
painful corrective action is that we have to pay interest on these
borrowed funds and there is already a big shortfall in the Social
Security Fund needed to meet future retirement obligations.
A further corrective action that’s painful is inflation. The
continued creation of money out of nowhere, plus these outlandish
deficits, is setting the stage for a healthy additional round of
inflation, which hurts everybody. The government says inflation
is under 3% per annum, but reputable independent economic studies
(Harvard, University of Michigan, etc.) show inflation to be in
excess of 7% currently. It is obvious that the dollar in ten years
will purchase considerably less than it does today, just as today’s
dollar purchases considerably less than 1996’s dollar.
Question: Market Watch has repeatedly pointed out that consumer spending has
kept our economy afloat. Can we continue to count on the consumer
to spend us to further prosperity?
Answer: Consumer spending has been tied into low interest rates, which rates
encouraged home owners to borrow money against their homes. The
residential real estate values in America represent about 1/3 of
our national net worth of $54 trillion, or about $18 trillion.
Last year consumers borrowed $600 billion in the form of equity
loans on their homes. The last eight months, inventories of homes
available for sale have increased 38%—the largest eight month
increase in history. Home prices have come down to the point where
consumers, and lenders, must face the following difficulties:
1) | $800 billion of mortgages have negative equity; | |
2) | Another 10% of mortgages have no equity; | |
3) | If prices fall another 10%, a shocking 48% of homeowners would have negative equity; | |
4) | Household debt is $11 trillion, and $2.8 trillion of that amount will be re-priced at higher rates in the next 18 months because of variable rate mortgages. | |
5) | Bloomberg just announced, on Oct. 25th, that “sales of previously owned homes in the U.S. fell last month (September) to the lowest level in three years, and prices of single-family homes suffered their greatest annual decline since 1969.” Wow! |
It would appear that the consumer is tapped out, and that the future
use of their homes as ATM machines will slow down considerably.
Conclusion:
There is only one guaranteed course of action in the stock market,
and that is the cycle of undervalue in stocks, to overvalue, and
back to undervalue. David Fuller of the highly thought of FullerMarket
service recently wrote: “We have often said that Wall Street
is in a bear market, which we define as a generational long period
of PE ratio contraction and rising dividend yields.” That
continues to take shape.
Equally well thought of Marty Barnes, of the “Bank Credit
Analyst”, writes: “The grinding equity bull market should
continue. Valuations are decent and market multiples should expand
when it is clear that the Fed has finished tightening.”
John Hussman of the Hussman Fund, who has been right much more than
he’s been wrong, disagrees with Marty Barnes and writes: “The
current climate in stocks is characterized by unfavorable valuations…..which
are sufficiently high that total returns the next 5 to 7 years will
probably fall short of Treasury Bill yields. This has been among
the longest periods the market has gone without a 10% correction.”
Lowy’s Investment Services feels a brand new bull market started
from the market low of 2002.
The above opinions are from four of the giants in the investment
business. All are thinkers. Two are bulls while two are bears. Who
knows what to believe? Record federal government deficits, record
trade imbalances, increasing inflation, increasing taxes, decreasing
real estate values, dysfunctional government! Lordy me!
Safe is smart. The plan outlined in the opening paragraph is the
safest way to preserve money, create a good cash return on investment,
receive good long-term capital gains, keep one’s risk under
control, and sleep well.
Besides, before we get too excited about the market at 12,000, lets
put into perspective a sentence previously published in Market Watch:
“For us to be “even” in the stock market from
the high of 11,722 six years ago, the Dow, because of inflation,
would have to reach at least 14,000 points.”
Caveat Emptor.
George Rauch
October 27, 2006