Market Watch - March 2, 2006
Last month we provided mathematical support for the stock and bond markets both being 30% overvalued. There is another hugely overvalued market we have not discussed that should ultimately affect both the stock and bond markets and that is the real estate market which has seen housing prices rise by an astounding $5.5 trillion in just 3 years. The housing market is beginning to decelerate in value. New home sales have fallen to the lowest level in a year, and the number of properties for sale has risen to the highest level in 10 years. All of this has occurred with the Dow spurting to a five year high even though the Dow has been very selective in its rise. Only four Dow stocks have risen to new highs and only two are within 2 percent of their highs, while 15 Dow stocks are down 20% or more from their five year highs. The chart below should be informative in trying to figure out, at least from a historical point of view, what we might expect over the next few years.
Bull &
Bear Market - Tops and Bottoms |
||||
#
Years |
Bull/Bear |
PE |
Yield
(%) |
Action |
1929-1942 |
Bear |
10.5x (*) |
6.2 (*) |
Buy |
1942-1965 |
Bull |
18 |
3.1 |
Sell |
1965-1981 |
Bear |
6.8 |
6.1 |
Buy |
1981-2000 |
Bull |
33.9 |
1.6 |
Sell |
2000-2006 |
Bear |
18.3 |
2.6 |
? |
* High and Low extremes represent optimum selling and buying opportunities,
respectively.
Question: We are coming up upon seven lean years in the stock market. After
that can we expect seven fat years?
Answer: In examining the chart, notice
that at this time the Dow Jones thirty stocks are selling at a price
earnings ratio and a yield that is equal to previous bull market
tops, such as the 1942 to 1965 market. It’s impossible to
predict, but history shows that we can expect values to improve
substantially over the next several years during which time great
buying opportunities will become available.
Question: When will that occur?
Answer: Nobody can answer this question,
but it can be pointed out that in addition to values still being
overpriced, the average length of a bear, or bull, market over the
last century has been around 17 years. We are only six years into
this bear market, so history indicates we are not even halfway through
the current bear market correction.
Question: Values have improved and
the economy has improved. Why shouldn’t we expect the market
to improve too?
Answer: The market may improve over
the next several years. Odds are, however, that the economic dislocations
we’re living with will have to be worked out before any substantial
improvement in the market occurs. Economic dislocations create risk,
and the market, like no other barometer, accounts for risk. Notice
that the previous bear market from 1965 to 1981 saw average price
earnings ratios as low as 6.8 times and yields as high as 6.1%.
Current stock market values of 18.3 times earnings are more than
double previous bear market bottoms, and yields of 2.6% are less
than half of previous bear market bottoms. Bear markets exist because
of bull market extremes. A bear market will persist until the economic
dislocations of the previous bull market have been rectified.
Question: These are different times.
Can’t the market reflect this difference, too?
Answer: The market can do whatever
it wants. Smart investors play the odds. The odds are that values
in the market will continue to improve over the next several years,
and buying opportunities will be much better than they are today.
Question: Market Watch previously
discussed the possibility of putting 30% of ones capital into Bank
of America, the gold ETF (GLD), and US Tobacco. Why would it make
any sense at all to have 30% of your funds invested now if values
may get better in the future?
Answer: Bank of America and US Tobacco
are both selling at very high yields with price earnings ratios
much less than their historical averages. There are always industries
in every market where certain values dictate it is time to buy securities
in those industries. Banks, tobacco stocks and drug stocks are currently
undervalued and represent buying opportunities now.
Question: What are the economic dislocations
that need to be addressed?
Answer: Consumer prices are now increasing
at an annualized rate of almost 9%; the market has priced into bond
prices two more increases in the federal funds rate indicating that
upward pressure on interest rates still exists; the money supply
increased $700 billion last year; the trade deficit was $728 billion
last year; the federal spending deficit was $650 billion last year;
consumer borrowing was $600 billion last year, and we have an inverted
yield curve.
Question: Can we break it down a
little bit and start by explaining the inverted yield curve?
Answer: An inverted yield curve means
that short term interest rates pay more to the investor than long
term interest rates. The bond market is saying they expect a recession,
which usually means interest rates will come down over the next
few years. Bond buyers, therefore, are trying to lock in good rates
for the long term.
Question: Will continued consumer
borrowing, record trade imbalances, war and outsized federal spending
deficits adversely affect the market’s performance?
Answer: Probably. Remember that bear
markets exist to rectify the excesses of the past. In 1995 when
the last part of the great bull market began to take the market
to extremes, there was a federal spending budget surplus, no war,
reasonable consumer borrowing and favorable trade deficits. Expenditures
in excess of income create debt. Debt requires interest payments,
and debt must be paid back. Interest and principle payments require
future cash expenditures that otherwise might be used for more productive
purposes.
Question: Won’t the government
just print more money to meet our future obligations?
Answer: That’s the problem,
and that’s what the market sees. Plus, inflation is now running
in excess of 8%.
Conclusion
There are four wild cards in the stock market outlook:
1. Middle East;
2. potential further breakout of oil prices on the upside;
3. the U.S. housing picture;
4. the value of the U. S. dollar.
As we know now, we went to war in Iraq based upon a set of assumptions
that were erroneous. Market Watch wrote an article published in
March of 2003 entitled “The Real War-Euro vs. Dollar”.
Iraq had begun selling oil in euros instead of dollars, the accepted
currency for trading in oil throughout the world. Since dollars
are 70% of the world’s money supply, conversion to yen, gold
or the euro in oil pricing could have potentially devastating effects
upon the cost of oil in this country and upon the value of the dollar.
Iran has now announced a new oil bourse which will start next month
and on which Iran will sell their oil in euros. The administration’s
haranguing about Iran’s nuclear capabilities and political
instability are carbon copies of comments we heard prior to U. S
involvement in Iraq. Could the probable economic difficulty created
by selling oil in euros instead of dollars be serious enough to
affect the dollar’s value in international trading, and could
it pre-empt a strike against Iran to prohibit their commencement
of a new oil market in euros? Such a scenario would clearly affect
the stock and bond markets.
The vibrancy of the U. S. housing market will influence both the
value of the dollar in international markets and interest rates
here at home. If interest rates increase, the dollar will remain
more attractive for international investors and will probably retain
its value. If interest rates level off and go down the dollar will
be less attractive in foreign markets, and foreign investors will
be less likely to continue to fund our large trade deficits by purchasing
U. S. bonds. In summary, a reduction in interest rates in this country
could save a currently deteriorating housing market, but make the
dollar less attractive to foreign investors who are desperately
needed to absorb U. S. trade and federal spending deficits.
Conclusion
Investors can look forward to instability over the next several
months. Dividends are still historically low and price earnings
ratios are historically high. The problems on the horizon dictate
that the conservative investor will continue to keep a lot of their
assets in cash, or cash related investments, and wait on the sidelines
for values in the stock market to improve.
Caveat Emptor.
George Rauch
March 2, 2006
*In future months, we will track these investments to see how they
are doing and to commit further amounts of capital to the stock
market when good buys become available.