Market Watch - April 27, 2005
The concluding paragraph in last month’s Market
Watch was: “While the Fed has been effective in stifling a
huge decrease in the value of the stock market, there is no real
reason to expect much of a further increase in the value of the
market. Indeed, the creation of all this new money out of nowhere,
the buildup of debt, the twin deficits, and the existing overvalued
stock market mitigate against taking large positions in stocks in
the foreseeable future”.
Nothing has changed other than the market has lost 500 points since
last months article. It is extremely important to remember that
an improving economy does not translate to an increasing stock market.
Particularly when the market is already overvalued.
The Money Supply
The chart below compares the GDP growth to money supply growth.
Notice that GDP grew 24% from 1995 to 2000 and that GDP in 2005
will be about 22% greater than 2000. Now notice that the increase
in money supply during the same time was 43% between 1995 and 2000,
accelerating to 52% between 2000 and 2005. The disproportionately
large increase in the money supply, as compared to the increase
in GDP, is why we have inflation. Anytime there is a disproportionately
large increase in the money supply, there is more money to spend
than goods and services that can be produced. The producer will
therefore increase prices to absorb excess money in an economy.
GDP Growth Compared to M-3 (Total Money Supply) Growth
Year |
GDP |
% Increase |
Total Money Supply
(M-3) |
% Increase |
1995 |
$7.8 Trillion |
N/A |
$4.4 Trillion |
N/A |
2000 |
$9.7 Trillion |
24% |
$6.3 Trillion |
43% |
2005 |
$11.8 Trillion |
22% |
$9.6 Trillion |
52% |
Pundits of what our Constitution
calls “gold and silver specie” point out that we had
stable prices for 125 years in this country because of the gold
standard. They point out that the only constitutionally sanctioned
increase in the money supply comes from what can be additionally
mined each year. That’s why we had 125 years of stable prices
until switching to paper money. In the 1930’s and 1940’s,
the US gold stock could be converted, one for one, to the M-3 money
supply. For every dollar outstanding, there was an equal amount
of gold backing that dollar. Today, gold and silver bullion owned
by the government represents a tiny fraction of M-3 money supply….believe
it or not, less than 2%!
Gold and silver retain their value. Historically, gold and silver
have been in and out of favor, as currency, many times. Governments
like paper money because they can create it out of thin air and
pay for their spending deficits. When the imbalance of the increase
in GDP, compared to the increase in the money supply, becomes so
great that inflation causes a currency to have little or no value,
governments are forced to return to gold and silver currency in
order to re-establish confidence in the monetary system.
It is impossible to predict if and when that will happen to us,
but it is certainly obvious that three things are happening:
1) | We have had a lot of inflation over our lifetimes; | |
2) | The rate of inflation is accelerating; | |
3) | Well managed, increasing inflation, is absolutely necessary if we hope to get out of our indebtedness (and our future Medicare and Social Security obligations) without a further currency collapse. The only alternative for us is to inflate our way out of these excesses. |
The Good News
A growing money supply is a force for new growth in the economy.
Our government, and many well-known economists, believes that further
great US economic growth is on the horizon. The Federal Reserve
System instituted policies that led to an increasing money supply
and lower interest rates. If interest rates are low, there will
be a greater demand to borrow money. The borrowing of money at lower
rates helps insure the economic viability of investments. The profit
from these investments will pay the principal and interest on the
borrowed funds, more jobs will be created, and the economy’s
growth cycle continues. Since we have not had a catastrophe from
our current increase in the money supply, and the huge buildup in
debt, we may conclude that the Fed’s program has worked so
far.
US manufacturers continue to shift production to China (mostly)
in an effort to increase sales by reducing costs. It’s working.
In a free market, the low cost producer gets the order. Economists
point out that China’s GDP of $1.35 trillion is equal to the
GDP of California. Japan, too, has many plants in China. America
and Japan’s GDP together equals $17 trillion, more than 50%
of the world’s GDP, making China’s GDP equal to 8% of
the combined US and Japanese output. It is pointed out that China
is far more dependant upon us, as customers, than we are on them
as producers.
China has forced American industry to become more efficient and
to produce at lower costs. We continue to enjoy productivity gains.
For the time being the US dollar has stabilized. Central banks around
the world realize there’s really no alternative to the dollar
at this point. The Euro is facing a potential double whammy. It
appears the French are going to reject the European Constitution.
Further, Europe’s laws to protect jobs and provide 6 week
paid vacations, along with medical care and other government “benefits”,
is not able to be modified. The decline in the dollar, and the increase
in our productivity, coupled with these problems in Europe, put
us in position to continue to compete in the future.
Conclusion
The above is the government’s thinking. Call me Mr. Dubious.
Even if everything that is being promoted by the government as outlined
above works as planned, we still face many challenges:
1) | There is beginning to develop huge hostility between China and Japan over who owns the drilling rights in the sea that separates the two countries. And China is trying to block Japan from receiving a seat on the UN Security Council. The détente recently enjoyed is in jeopardy. They are locked in a struggle for regional leadership. China has the people, and Japan has the money. | |
2) | With US productivity increases, and a lower US dollar, China’s growth must slow down (and it is). That, coupled with an inflation problem that exceeds our own, puts China in a position where price increases are inevitable. Price increases make Chinese goods less attractive in world markets. China now produces half the world’s DVD players and digital camera’s, more than 1/3 of it’s personal desk top and lap top computers, and about 25% of it’s mobile phones, televisions and car stereos. It would be devastating for China to loose part of those markets. The question is whether or not China can maintain currency parity with the dollar. It cannot. Older readers will remember the same things happening to Japan and Germany 25 years ago. | |
3) | The US core rate of inflation is increasing rapidly. With inflation increasing, purchasers of debt instruments are not going to be happy with the current rate of interest. The forcing of interest rates upward will lower borrowing and therefore discourage investment in additional plant and equipment. Such limitations tend to slow down the growth of an economy. | |
4) | The US current account deficit is now running at 7% of GDP. Historically, nations with trade imbalances approaching 5% of their GDP are forced into vast reductions in the value of their currency. Such a scenario would indicate that the current stabilization of the dollar will not last, and that the dollar could loose substantial additional value. | |
5) | 98% of the world’s crude oil producing capacity is being utilized.. The system is considered seriously stressed at 95% utilization. With 2% per year growth in petroleum demand, we need to find huge new sources of oil in order to avoid further, crucifying, increases in the price of fuel. |
The prudent investor will be judicious
about buying stocks at these haughty levels. It pays to remember
that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. Any
serious economic adjustment, to balance past irresponsible government
actions, could be very painful. More importantly, mathematically
and logically, any serious economic adjustment could send US stock
markets into a downward spiral.
Caveat Emptor!
George W. Rauch
April 27, 2005